Dr Jordan B. Peterson, Guru To the Mediocre Saskatchewan Male, In the Homeland of His People Tonight
And you wonder why Scott Moe is premier?
The fact that anyone in a position of public influence, particularly someone with a background in clinical psychology, would act or speak like this, nevermind to stadiums of men on a speaking tour in 2025, is disturbing.
“…To Transform Your Life” 😂
Into what, celibacy?
Gotta love that Regina’s REAL is putting this on. What a great opportunity to liquidate their “Show Me Your Regina” merch.
Well, maybe not that great - here’s the tickets still left as of the morning of Peterson’s event:
Can he even break even on that?
Big shout out to the guys who bought on the floor, though. You won’t miss a minute.
Let’s talk about Jordan B Peterson.
In this interview, Peterson suggested a link between a woman's choice to wear makeup or heels in the workplace and sexual harassment. He characterized makeup and feminine clothing as forms of "sexual display" and argued that a woman who looks good, then complains about harassment, is a hypocrite.
He helpfully suggest potential workplace rules, like banning makeup, questioning its purpose beyond sexual provocation. He questions why women use red lipstick, linking it to the physical response of lips turning red during sexual arousal (news to me? they’re usually busy, I guess I’ve never looked), applying the same rationale to the use of blush on our cheeks.
His assertion was that wearing makeup in the workplace contributes to an "atmosphere of sexuality," and he deemed it "absolutely naive" to think otherwise.
Tell me you’re a predator without telling me.
Dr. Peterson's reasoning appears to operate under the assumption that individuals consistently and consciously signal their intentions through their appearance.
I have to assume this was a time he was signalling his intention to lead Smurf Village into a new era of intellectual debates:
For the record, women choose to wear makeup and heels for a multitude of reasons that are entirely unrelated to sex or men (see: lesbians).
To reduce any woman’s choices solely to the intention of "sexual display" is misogyny. Period. The idea that a woman who chooses to wear these items or who just looks good effectively forfeits her right to complain about harassment is fucked right up.
Boys, read slowly and carefully as many times as you need to: power dynamics are all that matter in situations involving sexual or any form of harassment. Nine times out of ten, especially in a professional setting in this backwater, you’ve got it, not her.
Systemic issues and power imbalances are what explain things like the gender pay gap and sexual harassment. These are fundamental structural causes of the stank-ass professional gender inequality in Saskatchewan that we all know exists.
By the way, did you know that Jordan Peterson’s brother Joel lives in Regina and is business partners with Jason Wall, a long, longtime Sask Party hack?
Calm down ladies. I believe both he and his brother are taken. #sadtrombone
Like what the fuck is that supposed to be? What happens to so many Saskatchewan men when they crack fifty?
Have you looked at what you look like?
These guys are the harbingers of masculinity around here? 🤣
Joel sets up the meet and greets between his brother and Saskatchewan “leaders”. He’s also a former employee of the Premier’s office and remains a hardcore influencer inside the Sask Party government.
I know right?
So many good influences on Scooter.
Anyway, Joel’s brother Jordan believes "enforced monogamy" is a societal strategy to address the issue of violence perpetrated by individuals identifying as incels (AKA “involuntary celibates”).
Spoiler alert: there’s more than a few of those fuckin’ losers in Saskatchewan.
Lol “arrows from leftists” they’re such melodramatic, reactive, crybaby victims.
They’re not getting laid cause they’re gross.
That’s it, that’s all.
End of story.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Our Sask to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.